Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
He was a murdering terrorist. I denounce him as such. Happy? I've never said anything to the contrary. Will you now admit you misconstrued what I was saying?
|
It's tepid and reads somewhat begrudgingly, but it's a start. I don't think I misconstrued what you said, because that is the first time you said, what i said you weren't saying.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If they had their own country, we would have to devise our foreign policy accordingly.
|
Arafat didn't have a country.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Because I perceive it to be in the long-term interests of the United States to do so. Because I think the United States will be better off if there is peace in Israel and Palestine. Arafat, however flawed a vessel, was what there was to work with.
|
And what tells you working wiht bin Laden might not be a route to some peace? Your crystal ball? the same way that had Kerry winning in 04?
Different hypo, what if Musharraff gets overthrown and a Shi'a theocracy coems to power in Pakistan and "elects" bin Laden president. He comes out hiding to accept. Do we deal with him then? Do we let him come speak at the UN?