Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Yes, they have done something since then - they thwarted an attempt by a group that was planning to use them. With all armchair quarterbarking, the legitimacy of the criticism is inversly proportional to the vehemence and arrogance with which it is given. What is so funny about this post is that this guy has no idea what is really going on at the department. Why - because it is top secret. Yet does he use any qualifier when he makes his criticisms such as: "clearly there is information I am not privey to, but it seems....". Like with most arrogant punidits he is working with ten percent of the information at best, but act likes he knows everything. Pathetic.
|
Exactly. If there is truly going to be an effective security policy, the sheeple (including Ty's oh-so-erudite pals in blogosphere) are on a need to know basis.
