LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 836
0 members and 836 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-16-2006, 11:30 AM   #3943
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,146
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
It's the question of rules vs. discretion, Hank. If you were awake in the first year of law school, you may remember the issue. It probably came up when your friends in Pennypacker were shooting the shit late at night.

If you give people a meaningful job, pay them better, and give them a chance to make a difference, you'll get interest in the job. TSA offers none of those things right now.

And you correctly remember that the terms of employment at DHS were an issue, but you are wrong about how it ended up. The GOP won on that one. And yet TSA isn't exactly a model bureaucracy. Go figure.
discretion = profiling. as to TSA I am almost certain it's employees come under normal rules for Union/discipline etc. but have to go right now so I can't google it.

And the TSA people I see seem like they are quite interested- maybe not all, but certainly a good majority seem like people who do not want to allow the next 9/11 to happen.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.