Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
On 1: The issue is the amount of delay relative to the length of flight, which approximates the distance of the flight. In the US at least, most people make a decision whether it's more efficient to fly or drive (or train or bus). That's principally driven by time/cost. Obviously driving is a viable alternative to short-distance flights, but not cross-country flights (for most people). So, if you increase the time or cost of flying a short distance, more people will drive. In other words, you increase accident rates and waste people's time.
On 2: Sure, shampoo isn't needed for inflight use, but people also carry-on luggage to avoid checking it. How many people carry-on everything? Many, so it's an inconvenience. More generally, a screwdriver isn't something most people need on a plane or when they get there, so it's reasonable to be a little more suspicious of a screwdriver. I'd at least want to ask the person why they want it. Shampoo--not so concerned, unless it's a bomb.
|
On 1: Duh, which is why I was wondering whether terrorists don't really want to do shit to shorter flights because there's not enough fuel to make a big big BOOOOOM!!! If they do not want shorter flights, then it might be possible to abbreviate security procedures for shorter flights. Which would change (or, kinda leave the same, if we assume that security will be more extensive for longer flights) one factor in the glaringly obvious calculation everyone goes through when deciding whether to fly or drive. Or take a bus.
And, no WAY!!!!! Driving is not as safe as flying? Holy shit. Who knew? Oh, right, pretty much everyone who flies. Because airlines shove it down passengers' throats.
(it irritates me when people respond to something totally different than what I said)
