LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 94
0 members and 94 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-16-2006, 06:00 PM   #4044
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
And you dont' think this is all just a pretext for (1) trying to make it less convenient to smoke in the hope that fewer people will do it (you do agree that actually smoking increases cancer risk, right?), and/or (2) getting rid of an otherwise annoying and impolite behavior (i.e. smoking indoors and around others)?
not intentionally. the party of interference subliminally wants there to be no smoking for those reasons, but truly believes its laws are justified for the stated reasons. it's like how you say Israel shouldn't defend itself so much, but your real motivation is that you subliminally hope everything will get better if we just go back to ignoring everything.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.