LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 92
0 members and 92 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-17-2006, 06:40 PM   #4274
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Uh Oh!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I have read that drinking urine can cause renal failure, so there seems there was some danger to the other passengers. If she tried to pee in their mouths. But just peeing starts you down the slippery slope, so I think the arrest was warranted. eta: Figuratively. I am assuming no actual warrant was issued prior to the arrest.
how did we come to know she had peed? isn't that the operative question? certainly peeing on a plane is fine- i have done so on several occasions. So it must be the manner or location of the peeing that is in question. I am troubled how the Bush administration went about discovering these facts w/o seeking a warrent.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 08-17-2006 at 06:43 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM.