LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 969
0 members and 969 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-21-2006, 05:29 PM   #4487
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Slow PB day

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Fair point.

Let me put it this way, instead: The likelihood that our intelligence services (or Israel's, or anyone else's*) knows where the key installations are, with sufficient accuracy to allow for precision bombing that will significantly hinder or delay Iran's nuclear development without requiring the commitment of ground forces or a massive bombing campaign, strikes me as extremely exceedingly small.
We may have to use a massive bombing campaign, but the risk/benefit equation would seem to weigh in favor of the same. I am not arguing that our intelligence will be perfect, but I am not sure that there program is at a point where it needs to be perfect. UNless they have multiple nukes, ready for delivery, in disparate locations, it would seem that we could take our a certain percentage of the program and set them back several years or more, in which time other means might alleviate or mitigate the risk.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.