Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Talk about tenuous. There is no conflict of interest under the facts described.
There may be a grounds for recusal, but even that is thin. What if a judge had made a charitable donation directly to the ACLU. Should she recuse herself in that instance? I think not. Here it's even more tenuous--she has a leadership role in a foundation that decided to give money.
|
2. This is similar to Allito ruling on the case involving the mutual fund.
