LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 115
0 members and 115 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-28-2006, 11:46 AM   #4676
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,281
Victimhood (Prius Rant)

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
It's obviously a half-joke, but after I wrote it, I realized it's no less valid a response than that offered by the crowds screaming for a ban of SUVs. If we all bought Priuses tomorrow, the Middle East (and out own archaic energy policies) would never change.

The anti-SUVers would probably counter that there's no reason we can't change our energy policies without first having to run the planet out of oil. I disagree. China and India will just pick up the slack our decreased consumption creates.

I guess the anti-SUVers' next argument would be that reckless consumption over a short period of time would hurt the environment much more than minimal consumption over a longer period. I don't know whether that argument holds water, or if it could be proven or disproven based on the obvious lack of previous instances to use for scientific comparison.

I do know this. My half-joke is worth making to the next Prius driver who accuses you of aiding terrorists. If for no other reason than to amuse yourself with his response...
I drive an SUV. I'm not happy about it, but I'd end up spending a hell of a lot more on car payments than I do on gas if I bought a new car.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.