LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 7,387
0 members and 7,387 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-28-2006, 01:10 PM   #3928
patentparanyc
Registered User
 
patentparanyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: on an elliptical
Posts: 5,364
Deadwood

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
SPOILER SPACE.....















eta More spoiler space

















Christ, what an anticlimax. The setup was so good -- so many interesting possibilities. Aunt Lou, Woo's Chinese picking up guns, Pinkertons and Al's people and Trixie and....

And the result? One dead whore who played a completely unmemorable role in the series, and Hearst gets on a wagon to go to some other mine.

Sure, it looks like a fine setup for next season? But so what? If they're all going to fizzle like this, I don't care how good the setup is.

Deadwood is catching one of the diseases the Sopranos developed: That rather than wrap up a season in a satisfying way, they are more focused on creating a teaser for the next season.

The other disease the Sopranos got was focusing more on what happens than on how it happens - so we learn that Chris falls back into using heroin and Anthony Jr. is growing up with some responsibility, but we don't see how that develops and that's the interesting part. Deadwood doesn't have that disease, but after last night I'm thinking it's only a matter of time.
Sopranos did not need to devote a whole episode to Chris and that chick from ER or whatever Juiliana doing heroin or whatever they did the entire episode, and like you said, AJ and Blanca and company [the little kid] that was tedious and annoying. hell, tony's dream sequences were more entertaining and I miss Steve Buscemi
patentparanyc is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.