Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Our intelligence people have hard evidence that he was in Virginia at the time he supposedly met Iraqis in Prague. But doubtless you could look at that evidence and conjure some reason to decide that it's not "convincing." You'd think the fact that we have no more evidence now that we occupy the country than we did before the war would be a sign of something, but you're willing to believe that anything that sounds like it's barking is a dog but also to ignore all the dogs that don't bark. When you make up your mind to believe this sort of crap whatever the evidence, there's really no point in continuing discuss it.
|
I keep an open mind and am open to a coherent presentation of the facts, which is why the Iraqi al Qaeda connection still interests me, as I have not seen the facts convincingly disputed.
That said, I am also wary of both our intelligence and administration because you keep telling me that they lie. I know you believe Clinton, and I remember him telling me that Iraq was the greatest threat to ME stability and also, that they had WMDs.....2+2.......Fore!
