Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Furthermore, I'm not saying that all hostile combatants are entitled to the full range of protections of the Constitution. What I said was, that the executive branch of the US government cannot avoid its obligation to follow the laws of the US and the Constitution simply by carrying out actions that would be unlawful here on foreign soil.
|
So if Hostile combatants are not entitled to the full range of protections of the Consitution, what protections are they entitled to and which one are they not?
