LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,012
1 members and 2,011 guests
Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-15-2006, 05:02 PM   #1432
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
So if Hostile combatants are not entitled to the full range of protections of the Consitution, what protections are they entitled to and which one are they not?
Let's try to simplify this by taking the discussion into another hypothetical.

Can we agree that US soldiers cannot rape civilian women in Iraq? I am talking about the law that prohibits the soldier from raping. Whether or not the woman has a legal right of relief under US law has nothing to do with this side of the equation.

Okay, by the same token, the writ of habeus corpus is not based upon any rights per se a foreign person has or doesn't have under the Bill of Rights. the writ is brought solely to determine whether or not the military acted within its rights and powers in taking the foreign person into custody.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 PM.