Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Is that what we were talking about? Police actions within the US?
All this time, I thought we were we talking about Congressional clarification of allowable conduct during CIA interrogations on foreign soil of unmarked, un-uniformed terrorists from "armies" that are not signatories to the Geneva convention.
|
I was responding to what seemed to be your statement that the options and actions of those seeking to protect the U.S. from harm should not be limited in any way -- by using as examples (analogies) other instances in which we do impose limitations.
If you think that there should be any limitations, please feel free to explain what they are -- in terms of geography, citizenship, etc. -- and please be honest enough to acknowledge that your Administration has essentially fought a rearguard action since 2002-03 trying to protect the "no limits" position -- even as applied to U.S citizens on U.S soil.
S_A_M
