Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
Generally, it's not quite right to discuss somewhat publicly the appearance of a private person among her friends and acquaintances (and enemies?), when that person does not appear to be present and has not (at least recently) invited that kind of discussion.
I know that we at the FB do not generally engage in excruciatingly correct behavior (sssh, here she comes), but we also don't generally discuss one another's looks unless the poster has brought it up him- or herself or it's a recurring joke or line of comment.
More specifically, I do realize that in the past SB has brought up the topic of her own cuteness and that she and TM have gone back and forth about the fact that she was bringing it up (which may put this into the "recurring joke" category), but that was a long time ago and you didn't seem to be doing it in that vein. If that's how you meant it, I will put the wrist-slapping ruler away.
|
Okay, I did not describe her in detail I was very general and vauge and that wasn't outable so where am I in the wrong here?
I think it is hypocritcal since although I subjected myself to a critique people went to town with excruciating detail about floppy tits this and that which I thought was misleading and wrong.
