Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
He also started the whole thing by talking about "the homosexual community" and not getting into the girl part. Like, "the homosexual community really values guys who look like they are 16." And I can see what he's getting at, but I think he paints with too broad a brush
|
Even RT had to agree that the homosexual community is obssessed with youth.
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
and it's easy to read into what he initially said that this is impliedly in contrast to the heterosexual community.
|
If you are saying there was an intentional implication that only homosexuals are into youth and not heterosexuals you are wrong. If you are saying that an idiot reading the post might infer that then I can agree with you.
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Is Foley into men his own age, too? I think it's creepy when anyone is only into people (of the sex(es) to which they are sexually attracted) quite a bit younger. And the whole thing w/the statement from Foley's lawyer or whoever today/tonight that Foley really thought ti was important for people to know that he was sexually abused by a clergyman from age 13 to age 15 kind of argues against it being the hot, youthful appearance of the kid and toward it being the kid's actual age.
|
That is just a B.S. smokes screen. There is nothing abnormal or deviant about a homosexual like Foley being attraced to a sixteen year old boy. Was it wrong to act on it, especially with some who worked for him? - Yes of course. And I am glad he resigned.
