Forums

[Hank Chinaski]

• Appeal on school's lesson in Muslim culture is rejected
  
  The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday by evangelical Christian students and their parents who said a Contra Costa County school district engaged in unconstitutional religious indoctrination when it taught students about Islam by having them recite language from prayers.
  
  The court, without comment, left intact a ruling by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco last November in favor of the Byron Union School District in eastern Contra Costa.
  
  The suit challenged the content of a seventh-grade history course at Excelsior Middle School in Byron in the fall of 2001. The teacher, using an instructional guide, told students they would adopt roles as Muslims for three weeks to help them learn what Muslims believe.
  
  She encouraged them to use Muslim names, recited prayers in class, had them memorize and recite a passage from the Quran and made them give up something for a day, such as television or candy, to simulate fasting during the month of Ramadan. The final exam asked students for a critique of elements of Muslim culture.
  
  The students and parents who sued argued that the class activities had crossed the line from education into an official endorsement of a religious practice. A federal judge and the appeals court disagreed, saying the class had an instructional purpose and the students had engaged in no actual religious exercises.
  
  Linda Lye, a lawyer for the school district, said the same instructional material remains available for classes, though it is not required.
  
  "I'm delighted that the Byron Union School District can put this case finally behind it and get on with educating children and exposing them to the world's great cultures and religions in an appropriate way,'' Lye said.
  
  Edward White of the Thomas More Law Center, an attorney who represented the plaintiffs, said the Supreme Court's rejection surprised him. The case "presents significant issues of national importance with regard to public school education and religious indoctrination of children,'' he said.
  
  The case is Eklund vs. Byron Union School District, 05-1539.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NG4ILH1201.DTL

How is the ACLU not in on this one?

If you had read this:

• "get on with educating children and exposing them to .......religions "

Would you have bet ACLU would have been on board? Is Byron Union near any of you guys? Is there any explaination?