Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Clinton bought time during which North Korea stopped enriching plutonium.
|
It was clear they were developing their weapons program at the of the Clinton administration. The CIA discovered this and they admitted to this. So was this a violation of the treaty, or did Clinton leave a loop hole in the treaty that allowed them to continue the weapons program?
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop Bush prompted them to start enriching plutonium again,
|
Yes because they had no desings on building a bomb. They are just peace loving people that decided they didn't need a bomb because they felt threatened. Yes these dictators only get nasty when they are threatened. If you don't threaten them they behave. How many times have we made that mistake.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop and now North Korea has the bomb. So can you explain to me why Clinton's policy was misguided
|
He tried to Appease a totalitarian dictator and it didn't work.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop -- maybe you wish North Korea had the bomb sooner? -- or what -- if anything -- Bush has done to improve the situation.
|
He stopped the bribes. He has focused on punishing them instead giving them stuff. After Hitler invaded Poland, Churchill stood up to them and then Hitler invaded France and bombed England. So was the invasion of France and the bombing of England Churchill's fault? No they were Chamberlin's because he set up an atmosphere of weakness and indecisiveness that gave Hitler courage. It took Churchill time to teach Hitler that England had resolve. It is taking Bush time to undo the impression Clinton gave our "Dear Leader". Our Dear Leader exploded the bomb because Clinton taught him if you are bad enough the west will give you stuff. It is taking us a while to undo the damage of Clinton's message, just like it took Churchill a while to undo Chamberline's message.