LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,014
0 members and 1,014 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-14-2006, 09:28 PM   #3126
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,135
Appeasement never works

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I haven't posted to a single blog on this stuff, dumbass. Meanwhile, Spanky still thinks that we build North Korea those two light-water reactors, and club insists that it's 99% likely that North Korea continued to process plutonium between 1994 and 2002.

Even if -- if -- North Korea had some plutonium in 1994, they didn't make more for eight years.
The only evidence posted here was they had some in 2000, had enough in fact.

no evidence of the "didn't make more."

do you agree making an agreement we wouldn't honor was not a good idea, other than "buying time until Clinton's admin was over?" and I'm not hanging Spank out to dry, I'm going SJ mode- assume what Ty says is true- Clinton never intended to honor the agreement and provide the technology- isn't that way worse than not making the agreement- for the future I mean? I get how it helped Clinton focus on more important stuff.

Do you agree providing know-how wrt the power plants was a really bad idea?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 10-14-2006 at 09:31 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 PM.