LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,308
0 members and 1,308 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-30-2006, 03:06 PM   #4181
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
Testing, Testing....

Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
If that were what was being taught, there would be no harm.

Instead, significant amount of time is being spent teaching test taking strategies, like when it is best to guess.

See, e.g. http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/b...section1.rhtml

This example is for the SAT, but there are strategies that are at least as complicated for any standardized test - SAT prep just happens to be big private business and therefore lots of information is online. And there are many, many more strategies that are much more complicated.

I don't have a problem with my kids learning that 7 x 9 = 63. I have a problem with my kids spending weeks learning instead that if they can eliminate two of the answers, they should guess. And that when they guess in those circumstances, they should pick the answer that looks less correct. (Both of these are effective strategies for any multiple choice test designed by professional test makers - up to and including the bar exam).

I know this is not the intended consequence of testing. It is a consequence nonetheless.

Testing is a necessary evil, but one has to recognize that were important consequences are at stake (individually, the right to advance; school-level, access to funding), all strategies will be deployed, not just the intended ones.

I'm sure this happens, but isn't eliminating wrong answers, when you are not sure what the right one is, a valuable skill?

(For example: In Iraq, the U.S. should (a) cut and run, (b) stay the course, (c) other).
__________________
Where are my elephants?!?!
Sidd Finch is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 AM.