LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,185
0 members and 2,185 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-31-2006, 01:33 PM   #4305
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,213
Who could be against 65%?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Surely no one is against this in principle, except possibly the teachers unions. But how do you make it work? And, as a practical matter, don't you think that the reason teachers unions have been able to bargain for insulation from accountability is that when the negotiations come around, the school districts often lack money and have to give up something else? Let's face it -- one of the reasons to work for an employer that pays less is that you get something else out of the deal, like job security.
Job security creates lazy people. Lazy people do shitty jobs. Hence, the only answer remains putting these people in job jeopardy. We should all have to handle the fear of the ax. How else are people going to hone their talents? I think if you set up a system where some of the teachers could get paid serious cash, and mangement was encouraged to run a tight, economical ship, you'd see some wonderful teachers. And very happy ones. What could be better? Certainly, its better than this socialist lockstep system that encourages those who come into the system giving a shit and trying to do a good job into phoning it in after a few years.

You can't get peak performance out of anyone who hasn't got an incentive. How many firms have people on this boatrd fucked over because they knew exactly where they could stop and still get the max bonus?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.