LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,897
0 members and 2,897 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-31-2006, 02:12 PM   #4315
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Who could be against 65%?

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
FYI, the number for the federal government right now is 8.5%, and the missing 9 billion from NCLB represents over 3% of total national expenditures on primary and secondary education -- all of it money that should be getting spent in targetted districts. So, you are likely looking at a double-digit percentage of the budget of many urban school districts.

Like I said before, a well implemented program on these lines would be better than a half-assed implementation of another program - but we don't have a well implement NCLB act.
I like the idea of Federal Testing. I don't know much about NCLB because it is federal. I know it has standardized testing which I like. But I am pretty sure I don't like the idea of penalizing schools that do poorly. You should penalize people, not schools. If a school is performing poorly change the staff, but don't cut off funding. I don't really know that much about NCLB, but if it operates that way I think the incentive system is all screwed up.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.