LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,961
0 members and 2,961 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-31-2006, 05:35 PM   #4346
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Who could be against 65%?

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
That is not how it works, because as I said before, the job protection comes through state law. The districts are bound by these rules and are therefore not in a position to grant them or take them away.
If it's the civil service requirements you're concerned with, as opposed to the union contracts, the way you get those is you watch Newt and Tom hire all their buddies and treat public institutions as fiefdoms. Then you realize it's a bad idea and come up with laws that keep politicians from screwing around with the bulk of public employees.

Yes, I'd expect Rs to complain about laws like these. Unfortunately, some people take advantage.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.