LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,181
0 members and 1,181 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-02-2006, 03:53 PM   #4715
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,133
We report you decide....

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
If you think that posting that exchange makes you look any less grasping and foolish, I'm not sure I concur. I still don't see where Ty said he personally reviewed the transcript or anything at refutes his initial post. I just see you trying to spin Ty's posts to make it seem like you think he said something that he didn't. Why don't you respond to my prior post about why this bothers you so much? Or to Gatti's post that it was apparently part of a list of one liners about Bush?

I no longer expect more of you, if that is any consolation.
gloves are off.

your post here is a prime example of the bullshit lib response here and i mean that as non-hyperbole

- maybe the entire tape makes it seem he dropped the word, maybe if we saw a transcript we would believe that even more, but here you are accepting as fact Ty's acceptance of what someone tells him the unseen or read transcript implies, and, oh what Gatti's wife though of some film none of us have seen and that simply can't be linked to- that clears up the issue for your big brain. this on a board dedicated to a professional where we are supposed to be able to weigh evidence.

and yes it is spanky and I who are the idiots.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.