LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 129
0 members and 129 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 12-08-2006, 03:01 AM   #1717
Secret_Agent_Man
Classified
 
Secret_Agent_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
More Hot Air

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
And why rotate them out? We didn't rotate troops out of WWII?
(a) If you don't rotate units out of combat situations eventually, you destroy them. In terms of morale, fighting ability and combat effectiveness, if not literally. Our policy had been one year in, two years out. Now we've had to make it one in, one out. that is placing severe strain on some units now entering their third Iraq deployment, because of problems with training time, maintenance, etc., etc. (Not to mention their personal lives.)

(b) Yes, Spanky, we certainly did rotate units in and out of theater in WWII.

(c) P.S. Spanky, we did NOT rotate units in and out of Vietnam on a regular basis. Instead, we rotated the individual soldiers, marines, sailors, airmen, etc. in and out of the deployed units (one year tours). THAT was a big problem, and helped destroy unit cohesion. it is much better to have the same group start and finish together.

So, you really think we should just deploy all our forces into Iraq with no rotations -- just tell them that they are in Iraq until we're done or their enlistment contract expires (if we even let them go then)??

I repeat, Jesus Fucking Christ.

S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."

Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
Secret_Agent_Man is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.