Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Yes. There is no way the US could ever openly support such a move, but we could look the other way. Maybe I am off my rocker, but unless some drastic moves are taken it seems to me that Holocaust part two is on its way. And I belive if it happens, we will be partially responsible.
The Status quo is unacceptible. The occupatoin can't continue indefinitely and Isreal can't go back to the 67 borders. And the status quo could lead to some WMDs getting into Isreal through the West Bank or Gaza.
It seems to me that half doing anything is a reciped for disaster. The creation of Isreal should have either been done right or not at all (or at least at this point it shoud be finished). Otherwise I think it spells disaster.
Hopefully I am wrong about all this and the status quo won't lead to disaster.
|
The British public has a landfill's worth of nerve telling us they don't want their troops involved in the Middle East, considering every tribal feud amongst these Radical Islamists is partly a result of their drunken border cutting when they retreated from the furthest outstretched borders of their Empire.
Its funny India, the least Muslim (percentage-wise) turned out allright. Vibrant and brimming with Westerners and Western ideas, it's likely one of the top two emerging economies of the next century. It's much more Muslim neighbor to the left remains a third world garbage scow of a nation.
Actually, its not funny at all. Its predictable, and until we openly discuss the 800 lb gorilla that makes up the difference between those two nations, we'll be dancing around the issue.
Some things are better - more ideologically, practically and morally sensible - than others. Religion is not carved out of that axiom.
