LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 879
0 members and 879 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-25-2003, 05:54 PM   #20099
baltassoc
Caustically Optimistic
 
baltassoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City That Reads
Posts: 2,385
Just Chillin' at the Ole Folks Home

Quote:
Originally posted by mmm3587
No fucking here. Have I touched on some surefire method for getting the board all riled up?
You have no idea.

Personally, I think you're taking a thoughtful approach. Buying several things of the registry to add up to you internal total is fine, although I wouldn't wipe out all the inexpensive stuff in one fell swoop if there are other items in your price range (I previously (long time ago, different board) complained of someone doing just that; she was being kind hearted, but at the same time forced the poor-as-dirt well wishers to find gifts off the registry or pool their resources. I was roundly berated as being a buffoon and an ingrate. Which I can accept.).

I suspect BRC will say something to the effect that there should be no necessary correlation between cost of gift and wedding outlay. This of course goes in both directions. The gift should be a representation of your hopes for the couple. I agree.

I also think that your hopes for the couple can be expressed off the registry, even if the only thing left on it is a non-stick springform pan.

-balt(this gift represents my fondest hope that the two of you will have many happy years of making cheesecake together)assoc
baltassoc is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM.