LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 129
0 members and 129 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 12-23-2006, 09:02 PM   #2380
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky

I will defend the use of torture when it is used properly. But why should I defend the use of torture when it is used improperly. Or why should I have to defend, or be expected to defend the use of torture when it is used improperly? The use of torture in this circumstance was used for purely for sadistic games. What has the got to do with the proper use of torture? Do you defend the practice of locking up criminals? If you think it is OK to lock up criminals does that mean you automatically support what happened at Abu Ghraib? If a man kidnaps a six year old girl and locks her up in a dungeon, does that mean that anyone that is for locking up criminals supports that activity? Or that their support of locking up criminals led to that activity?
2. to follow Ty's logic we should ban fellatio because Clinton molested a 17 year old intern.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.