LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 181
0 members and 181 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-11-2007, 03:32 PM   #3160
Secret_Agent_Man
Classified
 
Secret_Agent_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
What I meant about "expressing" is the Congress is talking a lot but not doing anything to actually constrain the President's freedom to act as he sees fit.
Its early yet.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
And the President certainly doesn't care about what people think, since neither he nor Cheney are running in '08.
He's got lots of party pressures too.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If anything, we have policy too divorced from politics, not captured by it.
Under Bush, on some issue, perhaps so, which could be why it took four years and an election loss to force a serious reassessment. But in general, I disagree.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
It's a peculiarly Beltwayish view that thinks that too much concern for what voters think will produce bad results, as if politicians can be trusted to formulate policy if they are just left alone to do as they will. Some will. Others will be corrupt, or stupid, or misguided.
Nope. A good number of the Founding Fathers thought that way, long before there was a Beltway. It is really more of an "elitist" view, which has considerable merit.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
As in free markets, the accountability drives better results, in general.
Of course, but that doesn't mean a politician should necessarily do what the constituency wants.

S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."

Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
Secret_Agent_Man is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 AM.