Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Well, that's why I'm saying I have a dilemma. I generally support the idea, but without debate and a real look at the budget in the context of the rest of the legislative session (which just got started) I'm not sure it's the best use of state dollars in the world, all other things considered.
|
Really? 300 bucks per treatment to prevent X number of future cancer cases (that might cost big bucks to treat)?
Would the legislature pass it?
ETA: Although I guess one could wonder why it shouldn't be given to boys too, if the goals is to do away with HPV.
