Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
The point I was trying to make it that Ty isn't as Liberal as some on the board, he just has it in for W. If W. proposes it he's against it. If W. is against it he is for it. I could be wrong. Ty, why don't you let us know what things W has done that you support?
|
Either I'd waste a lot of time saying things that no one would bother respond to, or you'd complain that I haven't said enough, thereby proving that I'm anti-W. It's a sucker's game, so I'm not going to play.
Just a week or two ago, I praised Bush for a speech about economic inequality. You then argued with the Ty/Bush position, as I recall. More recently, I praised the deal with North Korea. So the suggestion that I'm reflexively against something if Bush is for it is a stupid one.
If someone is reflexively anti-anything here, it's you with Democrats. Which is fine, given your involvement with the GOP. But your trying to pin that sort of consistency on my is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
