Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Either I'd waste a lot of time saying things that no one would bother respond to, or you'd complain that I haven't said enough, thereby proving that I'm anti-W. It's a sucker's game, so I'm not going to play.
Just a week or two ago, I praised Bush for a speech about economic inequality. You then argued with the Ty/Bush position, as I recall. More recently, I praised the deal with North Korea. So the suggestion that I'm reflexively against something if Bush is for it is a stupid one.
If someone is reflexively anti-anything here, it's you with Democrats. Which is fine, given your involvement with the GOP. But your trying to pin that sort of consistency on my is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
|
Something he said about inequality? And you praised Bush for continuing Clinton's policy. Not really a vote of confidence. I asked you this same question a while back during our CAFTA discussion and said you couldn't think of anything.
And I support the Democrats much more than you support the Republicans. I don't think anyone on this board would dispute that. I just recently stated I agreed with almost everthing in their first hundred hours. Some liberals even suggesteed I should switch partys. I don't think anyone on this board thinks of you as a moderate Democrat that sometimes sides with the Republicans. That would be Sidd's spot.
