Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Either I'd waste a lot of time saying things that no one would bother respond to, or you'd complain that I haven't said enough, thereby proving that I'm anti-W. It's a sucker's game, so I'm not going to play.
Just a week or two ago, I praised Bush for a speech about economic inequality. You then argued with the Ty/Bush position, as I recall. More recently, I praised the deal with North Korea. So the suggestion that I'm reflexively against something if Bush is for it is a stupid one.
If someone is reflexively anti-anything here, it's you with Democrats. Which is fine, given your involvement with the GOP. But your trying to pin that sort of consistency on my is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
|
I think he's right that you're not as liberal as you might even want to believe. You've got a pragmatic side that pushes you toward the center.
But I think you're wrong on Spanky. The guy's come out time and time again as a social liberal. If anything, he's a libertarian in denial. The charge that he's reflexively anti-Democrat is baseless. He's reflexively anti-liberal in most economic matters. That's not the same as being anti-Democratic.
