LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,157
0 members and 1,157 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-23-2007, 12:29 PM   #1508
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
The Economist and Paul Samuelson question Free Trade

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Then what was the purpose of your hypos?
As I've said multiple times already, I was trying to figure whether your support for free trade was motivated by the principle of doing the most good (i.e., net gain to the country) or helping the most people (i.e., doing what is best for the majority) by posing a hypothetical in which the two pointed in opposite ways.

Your posts have convinced me -- at least for the moment -- that your support for free trade is not principled, in the sense that you believe free trade is consistent with one or more principles to which you're committed and that you would abandon free trade if those principles dictated, but rather that it's ideological, in that you are committed to free trade as such and espouse whatever principles are convenient as a justification for that result.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.