LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,540
0 members and 2,540 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 02:04 PM.
View Single Post
Old 02-26-2007, 07:29 PM   #1582
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Inconvenient Truth, indeed

Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
Well, for one, it could be based, you know, on actual truth. A source like that makes one wonder (although I have no idea whether the underlying facts are true).

And, of course, it could not engage in the obvious fallacy of comparing a house that is at least several times bigger than the average house, and certainly expends much more electricity on security, with the average household. Especially since the average household includes a huge number of small apartments.

That could be two ways to be less biased.
so its cool that he burns 20 times the electricity because it takes that much for an unnecessarially large house. Got it.

I think this means we get to keep our SUVs though.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 02-26-2007 at 07:49 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 AM.