LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,167
0 members and 2,167 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-09-2007, 01:41 PM   #3671
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Let's See How Fast

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Main Entry: dis·in·gen·u·ous
Pronunciation: "dis-in-'jen-y&-w&s, -yü-&s-
Function: adjective
: lacking in candor; also : giving a false appearance of simple frankness

Jesus, man... That's the best you've got at the end of the day? To admit the Left's cravenly opportunistic on an issue in which it holds itself up as morally infallible and then distinguish "disingenuous" from "opportunistic."

You do realize you conceded my point, don't you. My point was the Left is playing politics with that which it claims is an issue of such moral gravity it transcends politics.

It's fine to be a whore and a liar in politics, but when you hold yourself out to be morally incorruptible on an issue, you're disingenuous.
Who the hell is holding themselves out as morally "incorruptable" or "infallible"? (I recognize, BTW, that that's the cardinal sin in your universe.) We were talking about people who are against torture. If you oppose torture, does that mean you think you're morally infallible? The overwhelming political consensus in this country until just a few years ago was that torture is wrong, so it doesn't exactly take infallibilty to still think that.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.