Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
the rest of it was nothing more than asking if there isn't a bit of ignoring context in all the wailing going on here.
|
What is the context that's relevant? You're hanging your hat on the claim that no one objected to the program for two years, so that gives it some presumption of legality. Yet, it was a covert program about which few people knew and no one proclaimed legal. You're cool with the fact that it went on for 2-3 years in an unknown form more broad than the current program that later came to light?
