LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 108
0 members and 108 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-18-2007, 07:31 PM   #449
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
No, they really aren't. If your vote doesn't matter in the outcome of the election, there is no reason to pay attention to politics or vote.

If there is no distinction between the candidates, but you were the ultimate decider (i.e. your vote "counts"), the solution is to get new candidates, rather than of not voting. Or, alternatively, if you are the ulimate decider and there are any (even small) differences in the candidates, it is again rational to vote to be able to exploit those differences.
Semantics... a distinction without a difference. If you get none of what you want, and a lot of what you don't, the packaging is immaterial.

If the differences are so de minimus and don't affect you, the use of gas and time expended to get to the polls is irrational.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.