06-12-2007, 11:55 AM
|
#775
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Fourth Circuit bitchslap
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
Ok, Hank, I am confused. You originally said that there was nothing that Atta could be arrested for on 9/10/01, even though he was a member of a terrorist group. Then when I posted the statute that makes it a crime, you argued that only people who help hijackers can be arrested under that statue. Now it seems that you are talking about how hard it would be to prepare an indictment against Atta.
What exactly is your point? That we need to allow federal agents to arrest anyone and hold them indefinitely without bringing any charges? If so, are you comfortable with President Hillary Clinton having that power? Frankly, I am not. At best, we have something like the UK during the 1970s.
|
holding an up to date al queda membership card does not come under the definition.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
