LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 132
0 members and 132 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-12-2007, 12:33 PM   #780
Not Bob
Moderator
 
Not Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
Fourth Circuit bitchslap

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
"membership" is an oversimplification. Of course, we would know he is associated with it somehow. I don't see membership or association as coming under the statute (and just so you know, I would never have posted on this at all if I hadn't read the statute first, so no one showed me anything).
Well, the statute says that providing personnel, including oneself, to a terrorist group is a violation, so I think that you are wrong. How that is proved is a different issue.

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Does it matter if the acts were all on foreign soil? A guy is here working at a store. We know he went to an Afghan training camp. can he be charged under the statute.
That statute states that it has extraterritorial jurisdiction, so I assume that that means he can.
Not Bob is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.