LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 104
0 members and 104 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-20-2007, 01:36 PM   #943
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Rogue Ex Presidents

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I don't think you can criticize Israel for declining to deal with Hamas. But that doesn't mean that whatever Israel does is necessarily wise. For example, with Hamas controlling Gaza, Israel might decide to stop supplying electricity. I don't think Israel is under any obligation to provide power to a regime that sees itself at war with Israel and does not accept its existence, but cutting off power to Gaza would probably increase support for Hamas, and could be counterproductive.
They weren't just declining to deal with Hamas, they were (and are) refusing to turn over to the Palestinian authority funds they collected on its behalf; if they were to terminate the agreement, turn over the funds, and stop collecting it, that's one thing. I don't see how this is defensible.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 AM.