LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 106
0 members and 106 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-13-2007, 05:22 PM   #1977
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Bullshit

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
The carried interest is compensation. Just like the stock options and restricted stockgrants corporatee drones get. Just like the commissions the stockbrokers and other peddlers get. Just like the management fee. It's income. It's not capital gain for the PEs. They never put capital in. That's why it's called a "carried" interest.
Wait. You meant there's no difference between having a flow through interest in a partnership and having an equity interest in a corporation?

And last time I checked, my guys took their restricted stock into income based on its current value and all the gain was... well... gain.

Also, are you suggesting that when they have both a carried interest and an investment interest (because in my deals they always do), that they have two separate interests in the partnership, not a single unified interest?

So on the issue of the aggregate versus entity approaches to partnerships, are you going to advocate a consistent entity approach - just like corporations?
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 PM.