LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 93
0 members and 93 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-22-2007, 05:31 PM   #2554
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,281
These guys never sleep....

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Tell me to stop if you find this obnoxious, I just find this fascinating.


Homosexual Indoctrination in Schools


SB 777 to be voted on by the Assembly -- Immediate Action Required!

SB 777 (Kuehl), the homosexual indoctrination bill, may be voted on by the Assembly at any time.

Now that the legislature has reconvened, please call your Assemblymember and tell them to vote "NO" on this astounding assault on traditional values in the classroom.

In a sly attempt to counter CRI's public exposure of SB 777's true intent, Senator Kuehl recently amended the bill. Originally, the bill stated that no teacher, textbook, instructional material or school-sponsored activity may "reflect adversely" upon homosexuals or transgenders.

The bill now states that no teacher, textbook, instructional material or school-sponsored activity may "promote a discriminatory bias" against homosexuals or transgenders. This change in language is merely a linguistic slight-of-hand effort to confuse legislators and citizens as to SB 777's purpose.

Make no mistake: SB 777 seeks to implement a radical social agenda in California classrooms.

Los Angeles Unified School District has already implemented the policies contained in SB 777. These absurd policies include allowing boys who "perceive themselves as girls" to enter the girls' locker rooms and restrooms.

The language "promote a discriminatory bias" is so vague that those who seek to advance a radical sexual agenda could use it to introduce their agenda into school districts all across the state. Promoting a discriminatory bias could mean showing male and female couples in textbooks; allowing only females to participate in girl sports; prohibiting boys from running for prom queen, etc. The full ramifications of this legislation will extend to extreme reversal of gender roles and sexual confusion.

In the few, brief committee hearings on SB 777, legislators have failed to recognize the inherent dangers to young girls of allowing boys "who perceive themselves as girls" into female locker rooms and restrooms. As teachers and school officials grow accustomed to seeing boys entering female-only areas, they will be less likely to intervene for fear of offending a transgender student. Those with evil intentions will then gain access to innocent girls in otherwise safe environments. Proponents of SB 777 argue that these new policies will make students safer-this could not be further from the truth. True safety means restoring order and discipline to school campuses.

Please contact your Assembly member and tell them to vote "NO" on SB 777!
Whatcha wanna bet that the person who wrote this does the hand motions to Y-M-C-A at their kids' football games.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.