Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Cite (and please make it a primary source; otherwise it is not really a cite.
|
This (
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/02/wa...1173d7&ei=5070 ) only covers part of Ty's point--that Bush relieved Gen. Casey of the Iraq command b/c Casey supported withdrawal of troops--and it isn't a primary source, but I will assert that it is, indeed, a cite.
If you insist on citation to actual,
primary sources for defense-related decisions of the current administration, you've made your positions unchallangeable without the existence of leaked documents.
