[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Hold him but don't torture him. Question him in the way that law enforcement otherwise does.[/QUOTE} they told other people would torture other people. no one tortured him.
Quote:
|
He told them the thing was his when it wasn't. He lied, because he wanted them to think he was cooperating. So they mistreated him and got lousy information out of it. A lose-lose, except for those who groove on the idea of torturing people.
|
you guys had been in charge for 8 years. the world had gotten fucked. after 9/11 there was an unworkable number of suspects and we had to get through them quickly.
you have no tie to reality, but that isn't surprising. what gets me is on FB the one person who argues with you has arrived at the exact same conclusion- you copy arguments form somewhere and dig your heels in, and the guys you don't like are always wrong and the guys you do like are always right-
this is bizarre. A guy was found with that equipment where he was found (Notbob, I never post w/o having read the underlying stuff he was tied to the equipment, I realize incorrectly). We had too many people to examine to "do good police work". Clinton's negligence is too blame, if you want to blame anyone for people who were "mistreated." But I know you can't admit that- "Clinton had doneeverything he could!"
