LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 4,271
0 members and 4,271 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-17-2003, 10:15 AM   #23636
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,228
Things I would not like to read today

Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
1) stuff about breastfeeding (go to LIK)
2) stuff about periods
3) stuff about allergies

I would also like to make a new rule. Jokes incorporating infamous Clinton jokes are very 1998. It is 2003. Get some new material. And dont get it from Chandler Bing

but thanks for playing.
Paigs,

With all due respect, why do you think anyone gives a flying fuck what you'd prefer not to read about? Also, I've been prone to egomania at times, but in what state of megalomania does one come to the conclusion that the boards would give a shit about who is and who isn't on any one poster's ignore list? It seems to me that by advising the world of who's on one's ignore list, the ignorer defeats the very purpose of the ignore feature, which is to discreetly be able to avoid reading certain people's posts. By inciting discussion of the posts/poster one seeks to avoid, the ignorer perpetuates the offending discussion. This leads to the unavoidable conclusion that the ignorer is not really interested in ignoring anyone, but instead trying to focus the conversation on who or what the ignorer is ignoring. Ironically, that's a very dull topic which should be ignored.

S(so today's discussion will be what? hairy nipples?... just kidding)D
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 PM.