LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 2,526
0 members and 2,526 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 02:04 PM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Meet your new thread, same as the old thread.
View Single Post
11-08-2007, 04:01 PM
#
3759
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
First of all, State has usually pulled people out of situations as dangerous as Iraq now is. Vietnam and Haiti are examples. So to suggest that they signed on to get sent wherever is wrong. My friend signed on to be a diplomat. If he'd wanted to be in the military, he would have joined the military. My friend has served in the Middle East, which is where he picked up the Arabic that put at risk of being sent to Iraq, so it's not like he is unwilling to accept risk. Obviously, there is a quantum difference in going to Baghdad.
Second, my friend has a wife and small kids. They live on-site with him -- but obviously they wouldn't in Iraq. That, too, is not what he signed up for. Indeed, the life insurance FSOs have does not cover them if they're killed in Iraq.
we had no diplomats in Vietnam? Wasn't the embassy the last place to go?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Hank Chinaski
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
02:46 AM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com