Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
Right. Kinda like the distinction between a union election and a state's primary election. Except not quite as much.
|
I forgot, we're supposed to take your blogger's opinions as fact instead of actually looking at the cases and issues.
Here's another "fact" from Ty's blog-of-the-day:
- The outburst was prompted by the board's September work product: 61 decisions that both weakened workers' rights and ran counter to the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, which proclaims that the policy of the United States is to protect "the exercise by workers of full freedom of association [and] self-organization." Absent such rights, the act states, the nation's economy would suffer from workers' diminished purchasing power and run greater risks of economic downturns. It's a very Keynesian act, the NLRA.
So the board's purpose is to "protect worker's right." Period.
go take a look at the NLRB's webpage and see what the actual purpose is (hint, blogo left some important words out) , then read the two cases, then if you want to argure about it, try to find someone who will still rise to this nonsense bait and switch style.
