Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I forgot, we're supposed to take your blogger's opinions as fact instead of actually looking at the cases and issues.
go take a look at the NLRB's webpage and see what the actual purpose is (hint, blogo left some important words out) , then read the two cases, then if you want to argure about it, try to find someone who will still rise to this nonsense bait and switch style.
|
I wasn't arguing about labor elections -- I don't know enough about them. (I will concede that I am generally pro-union, based upon family history, but am not blind to union corruption. I also happen to think that business will fight unionization attempts by any means, fair or foul, but I am digressing.) Instead, I was attempting to point out that comparing the rules of conduct of a labor election to those of a state primary election is specious. And that Republican concern with the nicities of "one man one vote secret ballot everyone's vote counts" is sporadic at best.
And it's odd that you would criticize a bait and switch style. Any time anyone mentions global warming, you bring up Al Gore's house, or Random Rich Green Liberal's private jet.
