LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,481
0 members and 2,481 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 02:04 PM.
View Single Post
Old 12-12-2007, 05:21 PM   #4480
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Is it Me?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I would rather talk about the Pelosi thing you raised than about your stupid meta- schtick about the board. Back to Pelosi, then. Why do you think Democrats feel free to disregard national security classifications? Are you thinking of some other time that Pelosi disclosed classified material she received in that sort of briefing? 'Cause I'm not remembering that.
"Pelosi" as in the dems and their staff, tons of things over the past several years.

and beyond whether she discloses it, why do they mention it to congress? isn't the point so Congress can object when appropriate? did she take steps to raise the issue and try to reverse the practice?

the underlying point is that the Dems are completely full of shit on the issue because they accepted it until they could posture in public hearings. see?

can't fake indignation for the camera, how do you feel about waterboarding? who cares. I'm going to lunch.

Now, waterboarding out in public hearings how do you feel?

Barbarism! not something the united states should be involved in!

It shows the whole act is nothing more than posturing, and that the Dems don't put the country's interest above their desire to pander.

do you want to talk about that?


edit: and I'm sure it'll come out soon that she "was doing everything she could to stop it!" much like clinton and al queda.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 12-12-2007 at 05:35 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.